Artificial Intelligence in the Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Study In a Clinical Setting Using Cadeye
Rattachement africain : pt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aims Current guidelines recommend resection and histopathological analyses of all colorectal polyps. Real-time optical diagnosis can obviate non-neoplastic polyp resection (“diagnose-and-leave-behind”) and histopathological analyses of diminutive polyps (“predict-resect-and-discard”) reducing healthcare and cost burden. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided diagnosis using CADEYE (Fujifilm, Germany) in real-time optical characterization of colorectal polyps compared to endoscopic diagnosis with histopathology as the gold-standard. Methods Single-centre prospective study of diminutive/small colorectal polyps, between September-November/2020. Thirteen participating endoscopists were previously submitted to a brief online course of Blue Laser Imaging (BLI) chromoendoscopy. First, two independent endoscopists performed a blind optical characterization, with high-definition colonoscopy without amplification using BLI. Second, CADEYE on BLI mode was applied for optical characterization. Third, all polyps were resected and submitted to a blind histopathological evaluation by two independent gastrointestinal pathologists. Results A total of 159 polyps (mean size 5.0±2.4mm;2-9mm) were included, being 115 (72.3 %) adenomas and 44 (27.7 %) non-adenomas by histopathology. Regarding neoplastic/hyperplastic polyp differentiation, CADEYE had a diagnostic accuracy of 81.1 % versus 82.1 % (p=0.132) compared to experienced endoscopists with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 78.4 %, 83.7 %, 92.9 % and 59.0 % for CADEYE and 75.9 %, 88.4 %, 94.6 % and 57.6 % for experienced endoscopists. After excluding polyps with low-confidence characterization, diagnostic accuracy was 83.9 % versus 87.3 % (p=0.014) for CADEYE and experienced endoscopists, respectively.In the trainee setting (148 polyps), diagnostic accuracy was 77.6 % ( versus 80.4 % for CADEYE; p=0.201); considering high-confidence characterization, the diagnostic accuracy was 84.0 % ( versus 83.3 % for CADEYE; p=0.705). Conclusions CADEYE is an user-friendly tool with high accuracy in optical characterization of colorectal polyps, that may not be superior to high-confidence characterization by the endoscopist. However, both endoscopic and CADEYE optical characterization are still under the minimum desirable target (90 %PIVI). Ongoing optimization of artificial intelligence technology may allow future clinical implementation. Citation: Correia C , Gravito-Soares E, Gravito-Soares M et al. eP184 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE CHARACTERIZATION OF COLORECTAL POLYPS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN A CLINICAL SETTING USING CADEYE. Endoscopy 2021; 53: S156. Publication History Publication Date: 19 March 2021 (online) © 2021. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Artificial Intelligence in the Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Study In a Clinical Setting Using Cadeye
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2021
- Éditeur
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.