Hearing outcome following ossicular reconstruction for incus defects using partial ossicular replacement prosthesis
Rattachement africain : np. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Situation of incus erosion is common while performing tympanoplasties for cases of chronic otitis media. As none of the available techniques is said to be gold standard, a cost effective and easily available partial ossicular replacement prosthesis is employed and the postoperative hearing outcome is presented. Objectives: To assess the hearing results of ossiculoplasty using partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP) during tympanoplasty. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in a tertiary referral hospital of Nepal from June 2018 to September 2019. Thirty consecutive patients who underwent tympanoplasty for chronic otitis media (inactive/mucosal) with incudostapedial discontinuity were operated using polytetrafluroethylene partial ossicular replacement prosthesis without removing the incus. Pure tone averages, air-bone gap (ABG) and air conduction gain were calculated pre and post-operatively. Results: There was no extrusion of prosthesis. The post-operative air-bone gap less than 20 dB was achieved in 23 (77%) cases. All the patients had post-operative air-bone gap of ≤25 dB. There were no major complications. Conclusion: Polytetrafluroethylene partial ossicular replacement prosthesis is safe, reliable and efficient alternative for ossiculoplasty when the incus is found to have eroded during tympanoplasty surgery.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hearing outcome following ossicular reconstruction for incus defects using partial ossicular replacement prosthesis
- Date Crossref
- 30/06/2020
- Éditeur
- Nepal Journals Online (JOL)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.