Evolutionary process modeling with Bayesian inference of Spodoptera frugiperda ballooning and walking dispersal in Bt and non‐Bt cotton plant mixtures
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt) have been cultivated throughout the world as a great technological tool for developing integrated pest management. We hypothesized that artificial landscapes containing Bt and non‐Bt cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L., Malvaceae) at small scales could influence dispersal by ballooning of Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). We also simulated how ballooning dispersal combined with walking movement could impact resistance evolution in various scenarios of plant mixtures involving non‐Bt and Bt cotton plants with high‐dose and low‐dose events. The ballooning frequency of Cry1F‐resistant larvae in a treatment with non‐Bt cotton as a natal plant and Bt cotton in adjacent sites was two‐fold lower compared to when Bt cotton was the natal plant and non‐Bt cotton was in the adjacent sites. Our model results suggested that the higher rate of walking movement associated with ballooning promoted faster resistance evolution in low‐dose events, and contamination of Bt cotton fields with non‐Bt cotton plants in a high‐dose event showed the longest time to resistance. Therefore, a high rate of walking movement associated with ballooning negatively impacted the time for resistance to evolve in low‐dose events.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Evolutionary process modeling with Bayesian inference of <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i> ballooning and walking dispersal in Bt and non‐Bt cotton plant mixtures
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2021
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.