The histopathology of the humeral head in glenohumeral osteoarthritis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: The histopathologic wear patterns in glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GOA) have not been described. The aims of the study were to a) describe the histopathology of humeral head wear patterns in patients with end-stage GOA and b) identify clinical and radiographic parameters that correlate with observed histopathological wear patterns. Methods: Eighteen humeral heads from patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for end-stage osteoarthritis were divided radially into eight wedge-shaped zones. Each zone was subdivided into central and peripheral regions. Histologic analysis included measurements of cartilage and subchondral bone plate thickness, subchondral bone area, and cartilage structure was scored using the Osteoarthritis Research Society (OARSI) and modified Mankin systems. Clinical variables including patient history, physical exam, functional evaluation, and radiographic assessments were evaluated for correlations with humeral head characteristics. Results: Overall, humeral heads demonstrated a pattern of central and inferior cartilage damage, loss, and subchondral bone changes. However, within the group, composite maps of individual patient wear patterns demonstrated a sub-group of patients with a more focal inferior cartilage lesion. Overall, these more focal inferior lesions were associated with greater pre-operative range of motion (in both upper extremities), higher pre-operative SANE and ASES scores, female sex, non-dominant extremity, concentric wear patterns, and smaller inferior osteophytes. Conclusion: Humeral head cartilage wear patterns in GOA include central and inferior cartilage damage and loss. A histopathological distinction was identified between patients with more focal versus diffuse wear, which may manifest clinically with preservation of function and range of motion, and with less profound radiographical changes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.