Association of daytime napping in relation to risk of diabetes: evidence from a prospective study in Zhejiang, China
Rattachement africain : cn, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Diabetes was a major risk factor for numerous chronic diseases. However, the associations between daytime napping and diabetes in the existing literature is still inconsistent. METHODS: The analysis included 53,916 participants aged 30-79 years of the China Kadoorie Biobank prospective study from Tongxiang. Incident diabetes were identified through linkage with incident diabetes surveillance systems, health insurance system, and death registries. Cox regressions were used to estimate the associations of daytime napping with diabetes. RESULTS: 5.11% of participants reported habitual daytime napping. During 488,233 person-years (median 9.4 years) of follow-up, 3333 incident diabetes, including 1249 males and 2084 females, were documented. After adjusting for socio-demographic status, behavioral lifestyle, BMI, waist circumference and snoring, as comparison with those without daytime napping, the hazard ratios for risk of diabetes were 1.39 (95% CI 1.21-1.59). The corresponding figures for males and females were 1.45 (95% CI 1.20-1.74) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.05-1.59), respectively. The corresponding figures for postmenopausal and premenopausal females were 1.41 (95% CI 1.08-1.80) and 1.13 (95% CI 0.78-1.59), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Habitual daytime napping is positively associated with risk of diabetes in adults, except premenopausal females.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Association of daytime napping in relation to risk of diabetes: evidence from a prospective study in Zhejiang, China
- Date Crossref
- 08/02/2021
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.