Ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: Real‐world outcomes from the Sicilian network for inflammatory bowel diseases
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background and Aim Ustekinumab is approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). Italian real‐life data are scarce, so the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in an Italian cohort of CD patients. Methods Data of patients with CD who started using ustekinumab were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Primary end‐points were steroid‐free clinical remission at 8, 24, and 52 weeks of therapy and reduction of C‐reactive protein. Secondary end‐points were treatment response, treatment persistence at 12 months, and safety. Results A total of 131 patients (males 56%; mean age 46 years ±15) were included. All patients were biologics experienced except for one. At 24 and 52 weeks, 40% and 43% of patients achieved steroid‐free clinical remission, and 64% and 62% had clinical response, respectively. At the end of follow‐up, there was a significant reduction of steroid use (P = 0.012) and of the Harvey‐Bradshaw Index (P = 0.001). The probability of persistence in therapy with ustekinumab after 12 months of treatment was 89%. The only factor associated with discontinuation was older age. Conclusions Data from our real‐life cohort of treatment‐refractory CD patients suggest the satisfactory effectiveness and safety profile of ustekinumab.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ustekinumab in Crohn's disease: Real‐world outcomes from the Sicilian network for inflammatory bowel diseases
- Date Crossref
- 02/02/2021
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.