Effectiveness of an online interpretation training as a pre-treatment for cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder in youth: A randomized controlled trial
Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the treatment of choice for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but not all patients profit sufficiently. Long waitlists and wide variations in improvement rates ask for new interventions. We examined the effectiveness of a Cognitive Bias Modification–Interpretation (CBM-I) training that was offered during the waiting period for CBT. We tested 1) whether the CBM-I training is an effective intervention during a waitlist period for CBT, and 2) whether augmenting CBT with CBM-I improves treatment effect. Participants (74 children with OCD, 8–18 years) were randomly assigned to either a CBM-I training or a waitlist, both followed by CBT. indicated that compared to the waitlist, the CBM-I training was effective in reducing OCD severity, with a medium effect size. Patients in the CBM-I training condition started subsequent CBT with less severe OCD, and this advantage was maintained during CBT. However, the CBM-I training did not result in a faster decline of symptoms during subsequent CBT. These findings indicate that CBM-I training could be an easy to implement, helpful intervention during a waitlist period. However, replications in larger samples and comparisons to active control conditions are needed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Effectiveness of an online interpretation training as a pre-treatment for cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder in youth: A randomized controlled trial
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2021
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Amsterdam University Medical Centers pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Amsterdam pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Utrecht University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Academic Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Amsterdam UMC pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam et Utrecht University, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.