Utility of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis Score: Comorbid Conditions Do Matter

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) has been proposed as a diagnostic tool for necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI). However, its utility remains underreported, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions. The purpose of this study was to identify the test characteristics of LRINEC for patients with various comorbid conditions. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including patients with suspected NSTI. Our study patients were then relegated into the subgroups; intravenous drug use (IVDU), end-stage liver disease (ESLD), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of a positive LRINEC score (≥ 6 or 8) were calculated in reference to intra-operative findings or results of the pathologic examination. Area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots were compared between each subgroup and the overall study population using DeLong test. Results: A total of 220 patients were included for the analysis. Overall, the sensitivity was 76%, specificity of 52%, PPV of 32%, and NPV of 88%. The subgroup analysis showed low PPVs in all subgroups. The DM and ESLD groups had a high NPV (90.5% and 88.0%, respectively), whereas NPV in the IVDU group was 70.6%. The AUC and DeLong test for the subgroups were 0.649 (p = 0.902) for ESLD, 0.699 (p = 0.683) for DM, and 0.565 (p = 0.034) for IVDU. Conclusions: The LRINEC can be a useful adjunct to rule out the diagnosis of NSTI with exception of IVDU. In contrast, further diagnostic workup might be still required in those patients with positive LRINEC.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.