Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2020 article

A consecutive series of patients undergoing trans-urethral cystolithotripsy with ballistic lithotripsy by a tertiary referral center for neurogenic bladder.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background and aim of the work Patients with neurogenic bladder (NB) have an increased risk of developing bladder stones due to bladder catheter, incomplete bladder emptying, recurrent urinary tract infections, and immobilization. In these patients, minimally invasive treatments are usually adopted, as noninvasive extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is limited by the risk of not clearing all stone fragments, and open surgery is usually discouraged. The aim of our study was to present our experience with trans-urethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) in patients treated by a tertiary referral center for NB. Methods We retrospectively collected pre-, intra- and post-operative data from our patients, who underwent TUCL from October 2013 to October 2019. The procedure was performed with a 24 Fr cystoscope and a ballistic lithotripter. Lapaxy was performed with Ellik bladder evacuator. All procedures were performed by two expert surgeons. Stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as the percentage of patients with absence of residual fragments > 2 mm in diameter. Results We performed consecutively 90 TUCLs in 75 patients during the selected period. SFR was 94.1%. Intra- and post-operative complications occurred in one (1.1%) patient. Our statistical analysis outlined the SFR was affected in a statistically significant way by sex, NB etiology, stone cumulative diameter, and operative time. Conclusion Our series proved the safety and efficacy of TUCL with ballistic lithotripsy in NB patients. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials are mandatory to validate definitively TUCL as the gold standard therapy for bladder urolithiasis in NB patients, and to identify risk factors limiting the SFR.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Milan Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Neuro-urology Unit pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena et Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico — University of Milan, avec 4 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Urinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchNeurological Complications and SyndromesNeurosurgical Procedures and Complications

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.