IgG antibody response demonstrates inverse correlation with viral load in Bangladeshi women with acute hepatitis E virus genotype 1 infection
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To determine IgG immune responses and hepatitis E virus (HEV) viral load, and to explore the associations with pregnancy. METHODS: A total of 121 HEV-infected women (57 pregnant, 64 non-pregnant) were analysed. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) was done for 78 HEV IgM-positive patients to determine viral load, and Sanger sequencing was performed for 62 HEV-RNA-positive patients to confirm genotyping. ELISA was conducted to determine HEV antibody and avidity indices. RESULTS: The HEV genotype was identified as variant 1. Significant negative correlations were observed between log HEV copy number and log hepatitis E virus IgG antibody index in the late acute phase of jaundice for both pregnant women (r = -0.7971, p = 0.0002) and non-pregnant women (r = -0.9117, p = 0.0002). Pregnant women had significantly higher serum log viral copy numbers and lower IgG antibody indices than non-pregnant women in the late acute phase of HEV-induced jaundice (p = 0.0196 and p = 0.0303, respectively). Moreover, pregnant women with acute HEV hepatitis had higher cross-reactive IgG antibodies compared to the non-pregnant women (p = 0.0017). Five patients with HEV hepatitis died, of whom four were pregnant. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy might be associated with higher viral loads and a lower IgG response in the HEV-induced late acute phase of jaundice.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- IgG antibody response demonstrates inverse correlation with viral load in Bangladeshi women with acute hepatitis E virus genotype 1 infection
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2021
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.