Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2020 conference-abstract

417. Comparative Assessment of Multiple SARS-CoV-2 Antibody and Neutralization Assays from Blood Samples in COVID-19 Infected Patients

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19) has caused a world-wide pandemic. Diagnosis is usually made by an RT-PCR test from a respiratory sample. A number of tests are available for antibody detection or assessment, including rapid, enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and neutralization. However, characterization of the antibody immune response is not well documented and the clinical significance of COVID antibodies remains largely unknown. In addition, comparison of results across different assay formats using identical samples has not been rigorously studied, making clinical interpretation of serologic tests difficult. Assessment of multiple SARS-CoV-2 antibody and neutralization assays from blood samples in COVID-19 infected patients Methods 1–5 serial (total 33) serum or plasma samples from 14 patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by EUA authorized RT-PCR assays from nasopharyngeal specimens where tested with the following COVID-19 antibody tests: LFA rapid tests (Chembio DPP IgM/IgG, SD Biosensor Standard IgM/IgG, BTNX Rapid Response IgM/IgG), and EIA tests (BioRad Platelia SARS-CoV-2 Total antibody-IgG/IgM/IgA, EuroImmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG, and EuroImmun SARS-CoV-2 IgA). See Table 1 for results and EUA. Results were recorded as positive, negative, or equivocal. Additionally, antibody neutralization was assessed on matched samples. Results Mean age of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients was 73 years (range 65–89), 11/14 had symptoms, all were male and hospitalized (6 ICU), and 3 died. Average number of days serum was collected after RT-PCR positivity was 13.5 days (range -3 to 46 d). BTNX assay was only tested on 16 samples. Among all assays, total concordance of results was 91%. When only IgG/IgM or total antibody assays were considered, concordance of results was 96% (Table). IgA specific results were discordant in 9/33 (27%) of samples compared to other assays. Two patients were negative in all assays in serial samples collected within one week of PCR positivity. Antibody neutralization was detected, but not from all samples. Conclusion In general, there was good agreement among antibody detection assays. Neutralization may reflect disease outcome. The study was limited by the number of positive samples and patient number, and at the time specificity was not addressed for all the assays. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
417. Comparative Assessment of Multiple SARS-CoV-2 Antibody and Neutralization Assays from Blood Samples in COVID-19 Infected Patients
Date Crossref
01/10/2020
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.