Production of monoclonal antibodies to immunogenic peptides of ω-glaidin/c-hordein and rye-secalin for gluten free food screening
Rattachement africain : my, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: The ω-glaidin/c-hordein (QPFPQPEQPFPW) and rye-secalin (QPFPQPQQPIPQ) peptides have previously demonstrated immunogenicity in sensitised coeliac T cell lines. The development of monoclonal antibody to those immunogenic peptides is presented with a view of developing an improved enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as a reliable tool to screen the safety of foods specialised for coeliac disease (CD) patients. Methods: Balb/C mice were fed with gluten free food. The immunogens were conjugated to purified tuberculin protein derivative (PPD) with glutaraldehyde and emulsified in Freund’s adjuvant. The employed immunization schedule included 3-5 weeks intervals, followed by a final intravenous injection without adjuvant, 3-4 days prior to fusion. Results: The antibody produced was IgM rather than IgG, although the hybridoma was successfully generated. The IgM class antibody is known to be relatively unstable, so could not be used in kits designed for food screening. Conclusions: The immunogenic peptides could possibly be used to raise monoclonal antibodies for gluten screening. However, a single booster injection might be insufficient to stimulate the spleen directly or the mice should be immunized with higher concentration of immunogen. This could be improved by including multiple booster administrations and increasing the dose.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Production of monoclonal antibodies to immunogenic peptides of ω-glaidin/c-hordein and rye-secalin for gluten free food screening
- Date Crossref
- 06/04/2020
- Éditeur
- IIUM Press
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.