Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2017 article

Multiband variability studies and novel broadband SED modeling of Mrk 501 in 2009

31Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
111Institutions déclarées
24Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : jp, ch, it, pl, hr, fi, in, de, es, br, us, bg, ca, ie, cn, ar, Afrique du Sud, ru, gr, ge, tw, mx, gb, ua. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Aims. We present an extensive study of the BL Lac object Mrk 501 based on a data set collected during the multi-instrument campaign spanning from 2009 March 15 to 2009 August 1, which includes, among other instruments, MAGIC, VERITAS, Whipple 10 m, and Fermi-LAT to cover the γ-ray range from 0.1 GeV to 20 TeV, RXTE and Swift to cover wavelengths from UV to hard X-rays, and GASP-WEBT that provides coverage of radio and optical wavelengths. Optical polarization measurements were provided for a fraction of the campaign by the Steward and St.Petersburg observatories. We evaluate the variability of the source and interband correlations, the γ-ray flaring activity occurring in May 2009, and interpret the results within two synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) scenarios. \nMethods. The multiband variability observed during the full campaign is addressed in terms of the fractional variability, and the possible correlations are studied by calculating the discrete correlation function for each pair of energy bands, where the significance was evaluated with dedicated Monte Carlo simulations. The space of SSC model parameters is probed following a dedicated grid-scan strategy, allowing for a wide range of models to be tested and offering a study of the degeneracy of model-to-data agreement in the individual model parameters, hence providing a less biased interpretation than the “single-curve SSC model adjustment” typically reported in the literature. \nResults. We find an increase in the fractional variability with energy, while no significant interband correlations of flux changes are found on the basis of the acquired data set. The SSC model grid-scan shows that the flaring activity around May 22 cannot be modeled adequately with a one-zone SSC scenario (using an electron energy distribution with two breaks), while it can be suitably described within a two-independent-zone SSC scenario. Here, one zone is responsible for the quiescent emission from the averaged 4.5-month observing period, while the other one, which is spatially separated from the first, dominates the flaring emission occurring at X-rays and very high energy (> 100 GeV, VHE) γ-rays. The flaring activity from May 1, which coincides with a rotation of the electric vector polarization angle (EVPA), cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by either a one-zone or a two-independent-zone SSC model, yet this is partially affected by the lack of strictly simultaneous observations and the presence of large flux changes on sub-hour timescales (detected at VHE γ-rays). \nConclusions. The higher variability in the VHE emission and lack of correlation with the X-ray emission indicate that, at least during the 4.5-month long observing campaign in 2009, the highest-energy (and most variable) electrons that are responsible for the VHE γ-rays do not make a dominant contribution to the ∼1 keV emission. Alternatively, there could be a very variable component contributing to the VHE γ-ray emission in addition to that coming from the SSC scenario. The studies with our dedicated SSC grid-scan show that there is some degeneracy in both the one-zone and the two-zone SSC scenarios probed, with several combinations of model parameters yielding a similar model-to-data agreement, and some parameters better constrained than others. The observed γ-ray flaring activity, with the EVPA rotation coincident with the first γ-ray flare, resembles those reported previously for low frequency peaked blazars, hence suggesting that there are many similarities in the flaring mechanisms of blazars with different jet properties.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les institutions déclarées

Tokai UniversityETH ZurichTokushima UniversityUniversity of TriesteUniversity of ŁódźMedical University of LodzNational Institute for AstrophysicsUniversity of SienaUniversity of ZagrebTurku Centre for Computer ScienceRuđer Bošković InstituteSaha Institute of Nuclear PhysicsJapanese Urological AssociationMax Planck Institute for PhysicsInstitute for High Energy PhysicsCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas FísicasUniversidad Complutense de MadridTU Dortmund UniversityGoddard Space Flight CenterUniversity of PaduaUniversidad de La LagunaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di PadovaDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESYHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversity of WürzburgÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneOsservatorio astronomico di BolognaSwiss Data Science CenterSwiss Institute of Comparative LawInstitute of Space SciencesUniversity of OuluUniversity of PisaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di PisaUniversity of TurkuUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInstitute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear EnergyInstitut d'Estudis Espacials de CatalunyaInstitute of Space SciencesInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasKyoto UniversityThe University of TokyoMax Planck Institute for Nuclear PhysicsUniversity of UtahMcGill UniversitySasol (Germany)University of BolognaUniversity of Maryland, College ParkInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsWashington University in St. LouisCenter for Astrophysics Harvard & SmithsonianUniversity College DublinUniversity of California, Los AngelesOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of GalwayPurdue University West LafayetteTsinghua UniversityIowa State UniversityPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaAdler PlanetariumUniversity of DelawareColumbia UniversityUniversity of IowaDePauw UniversityBarnard CollegeGeorgia Institute of TechnologyState Street (United States)Fermi National Accelerator LaboratoryUniversity of ChicagoInstitute of Astronomy and Space PhysicsUniversity of PotsdamMunster Technological UniversityUniversity of California, Santa CruzArgonne National LaboratoryUniversity of JohannesburgOsservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoUniversity of MichiganSt Petersburg UniversityPulkovo ObservatoryUniversity of CreteFoundation for Research and Technology HellasOsservatorio Astronomico della Regione Autonoma Valle d'AostaKazan Federal UniversityEvgeni Kharadze Georgian National Astrophysical ObservatoryNational Central UniversityAoyama Gakuin UniversityUniversity of Colorado DenverBrigham Young UniversityTokyo Institute of TechnologyNational Institute of Astrophysics, Optics and ElectronicsUniversidad de GuadalajaraUniversity of DenverUniversity of ArizonaSpace Science InstitutePomona CollegeUniversity of LeicesterAstronomical Observatory of RomeUniversity of TrentoUniversities Space Research AssociationAstro Space CenterMax Planck Institute for Radio AstronomyUniversitat de ValènciaParc Científic de la Universitat de ValènciaCrimean Astrophysical ObservatoryLomonosov Moscow State UniversityNational Observatory of AthensWhittier CollegeAalto UniversityIstituto di Radioastronomia di BolognaOsservatorio Astrofisico di CataniaCalifornia Institute of Technology

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Astrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyNeutrino Physics Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.