PCSK-9 Inhibitors in a Real-World Setting and a Comparison Between Alirocumab and Evolocumab in Heterozygous FH Patients
Rattachement africain : mx, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract A real-world setting study of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients who received Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in a specialized referral center in Mexico City. Ten patients between the ages of 18 and 70 years, with a diagnosis of FH according to Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria, with failure to achieve their Low-density lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, and with standard therapy between 2016 and 2017 enrolled in a simple randomization in which a group of 5 participants received alirocumab (75 mg every 2 weeks) and the remaining 5 patients received evolocumab (140 mg every 2 weeks). Comparative analysis was made, analyzing the means of LDL at baseline at 4, 6, and 12 weeks. The evolocumab group had an average initial LDL-C of 277 mg/dL, which, after 12 weeks of treatment, was significantly reduced to 116 mg/dL; P = 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5–310.9). The alirocumab group with a mean initial LDL-C of 229 mg/dL showed a reduction of LDL-C levels at 12 weeks of treatment to 80 mg/dL; P = 0.008 (95% CI: 63.8–233.7). In conclusion, PCSK9 inhibitors are an excellent treatment option in patients with FH who do not reach their LDL-C goals with standard therapy or due to intolerance to the standard therapy. There is no difference in the lipid-lowering effect between both PSCK9 inhibitors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- PCSK-9 Inhibitors in a Real-World Setting and a Comparison Between Alirocumab and Evolocumab in Heterozygous FH Patients
- Date Crossref
- 18/11/2020
- Éditeur
- The Endocrine Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.