Impact of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C on pulmonary hemodynamics
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cases of portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) developing after DAA therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have been reported. The purpose of the study was to assess the effects of DAA treatment for HCV infection on pulmonary hemodynamics. 91 patients with liver cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (hepatic venous pressure gradient, HVPG≥10 mmHg) were evaluated. Right heart catheterization and HVPG measurement were performed at baseline (BL), 6 months (6m) and 2 years (2y) after finishing DAA treatment. Results: All patients achieved sustained viral response. Results on pulmonary hemodynamics and HVPG are shown in Table 1. Mean Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) increase by 2 mmHg at 6m and remained stable at 2y assessment. One patient (1.1%) had PoPH (PAP>20mmHg, PVR >3UWood) at BL, 2 (2.1%) at 6m, and 4(4.4%) at 2y after finishing DAA therapy. The HVPG decreased significantly after 6m and decreased further after 2y. At 2y 20(22%) patients had HVPG <10mmHg. There was inverse correlation between the decrease in HVPG and the increase in PVR (r=0.20, p=0.03). Conclusions: DAA treatment for HCV infection produces an increase in PAP that in a reduce proportion of patients leads to the development of pulmonary hypertension. Evaluation with echocardiography before starting DAA therapy and up to 2 years after finishing it is recomended.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C on pulmonary hemodynamics
- Date Crossref
- 07/09/2020
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.