Aller au contenu principal
2020 conference-abstract

Characterisation of severe eosinophilic asthma patients who failed Mepolizumab therapy

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: In the UK, the criteria to withdraw mepolizumab therapy from patients with severe eosinophilic asthma include failure to achieve 50% reduction in exacerbation rate or a clinically important reduction in maintenance oral corticosteroids. Aim: To characterise the patients who failed to continue receiving mepolizumab Methods: Retrospective review of a clinical database and case notes for patients who received mepolizumab in Glenfield hospital, Leicester UK, between May 2017 to Feb 2020. Results: 21 out of a total 94 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who received mepolizumab during the study period, had treatment stopped, the causes are listed in table 1. From the group considered to have failed mepolizumab therapy, 4/15 patients had underlying immunodeficiencies including common variable immune deficiency and specific antibody deficiency that required regular immunoglobulin therapy, 2/15 with bronchiectasis and recurrent bronchitis initiating prophylaxis Azithromycin therapy and 3/15 patients who requested treatment withdrawal due to lack of perceived benefits. The remaining 6/15 patients were deemed by the MDT to have failed mepolizumab therapy without a defined cause. Conclusion: Treatment failure with mepolizumab may be secondary to exacerbation events that are driven by infection, necessitating the need to characterise exacerbations carefully prior to initiating type-2 monoclonals in severe asthma.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Characterisation of severe eosinophilic asthma patients who failed Mepolizumab therapy
Date Crossref
07/09/2020
Éditeur
European Respiratory Society
Type
proceedings-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Asthma and respiratory diseases

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.