Influences of climatic and social environment on variable maternal allocation among offspring in Alpine marmots
Rattachement africain : fr, is. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In an environment with limited resources, parents may trade-off the number of offspring produced against offspring mass. To maximize fitness under unpredictable environments, females must not only maximize mean annual reproductive success but also minimize between-year variation in reproductive success. Thus, preferred strategies of maternal allocation might be to maximize the mass of their offspring or to produce a number of offspring of variable body masses. Many social species have evolved in variable and unpredictable environments where only the social environment can be predicted. If mothers seem to alter their total reproductive allocation to offspring depending on their social environment, how the total expenditure is allocated between the different offspring is still unknown. Here, we analysed how climatic and social environments influence strategies of maternal allocation and how these strategies impact pup first-year survival in a wild population of Alpine marmots monitored between 1990 and 2016. We found that females acted as income breeders using resources immediately available for reproduction. Our results showed that the proportion of maternal mass allocated to offspring varied mainly with litter size. However, how maternal allocation is shared between pups depended on climatic and social environments. In general, mothers tended to have litters of greater average mass and small variability in favourable social environments or when resources are abundant and lighter average pup mass but high variability in unfavourable social environments or when resources are scarce. This variable allocation could correspond to dynamic bet-hedging such that mothers influence the variance of pup mass within the litter in response to poor current environmental conditions. Our analysis of first-year survival showed that females should maximize the body mass of their young whatever the conditions will be because pups of higher mass have higher survival, regardless of environmental conditions. When resources are scarce, this strategy might not be achievable for all pups so that mothers produced variable pups. In large litters, this strategy increased first-year survival. Because pup variability affects parental fitness, differential allocation between pups of the same litter could have large consequences on fitness and thus on reproductive strategies of social species.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Influences of climatic and social environment on variable maternal allocation among offspring in Alpine marmots
- Date Crossref
- 29/11/2020
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Lyon 1 Université pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Hólar University College pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Institut Universitaire de France pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
UMR CNRS 5558 Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive Univ Lyon Université Claude Bernard (Lyon I) Villeurbanne France pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Department of Aquaculture and Fish Biology Hólar University Sauðrkrókur Iceland pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Lyon 1 Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.