Structural classification of proteins based on the computationally efficient recurrence quantification analysis and horizontal visibility graphs

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Motivation Protein structure prediction is one of the most significant problems in bioinformatics, as it has a prominent role in understanding the function and evolution of proteins. Designing a computationally efficient but at the same time accurate prediction method remains a pressing issue, especially for sequences that we cannot obtain a sufficient amount of homologous information from existing protein sequence databases. Several studies demonstrate the potential of utilizing chaos game representation (CGR) along with time series analysis tools such as recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), complex networks, horizontal visibility graphs (HVG) and others. However, the majority of existing works involve a large amount of features and they require an exhaustive, time consuming search of the optimal parameters. To address the aforementioned problems, this work adopts the generalized multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis (GmdRQA) as an efficient tool that enables to process concurrently a multidimensional time series and reduce the number of features. In addition, two data-driven algorithms, namely average mutual information (AMI) and false nearest neighbors (FNN), are utilized to define in a fast yet precise manner the optimal GmdRQA parameters. Results The classification accuracy is improved by the combination of GmdRQA with the HVG. Experimental evaluation on a real benchmark dataset demonstrates that our methods achieve similar performance with the state-of-the-art but with a smaller computational cost. Availability The code to reproduce all the results is available at https://github.com/aretiz/protein_structure_classification/tree/main . Contact edoutsi@ics.forth.gr Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.