Prospective study of short-term quality-of-life after traumatic rib fractures

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Postdischarge convalescence after traumatic rib fractures remains unclear. We hypothesized that patients with rib fractures, even as an isolated injury, have associated poor quality of life (QoL) after discharge. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled adult patients at our level I trauma center with rib fractures between July 2019 and January 2020. We assessed QoL at 1 and 3 months after discharge using the Trauma-specific Quality-of-Life (T-QoL; 43-question survey evaluating five QoL domains on a 4-point Likert scale, where 4 indicates optimal and 1, worst QoL) and supplementary questionnaires. We used generalized estimating equations to assess T-QoL score trends over time and effect of age, sex, injury pattern, self-perceived injury severity, and Injury Severity Score. RESULTS: We enrolled 139 patients (108 completed the first and 93 completed both surveys). Three months after discharge, 33% of patients were not working at preinjury capacity, and 7% were still using opioid analgesia. Suffering rib fractures mostly impacted recovery and resilience (T-QoL score, mean [robust standard error] at 1 month, 2.7 [0.1]; 3 months, 3.0[0.1]) and physical well-being domains (1 month, 2.5 [0.1]; 3 months, 2.9[0.1]). Quality of life improved over time across all domains. Compared with patients who perceived their injuries as mild/moderate, patients who perceived their injuries as severe/very severe reported worse T-QoL scores across all domains. In contrast, Injury Severity Score did not affect QoL. Patients 65 years or older (-0.6 [0.1]) and women (-0.6 [0.2]) reported worse functional engagement compared with those 65 years or older and men, respectively. CONCLUSION: We found that patients with traumatic rib fractures experience suboptimal QoL after discharge. Quality of life improved over time, but even 3 months after discharge, patients reported challenges performing activities of daily living, slower-than-expected recovery, and not returning to work at preinjury capacity. Perception of injury severity had a large effect on QoL. Patients with rib fractures may benefit from close short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.