Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2020 conference-abstract

A-245 So What's the Damage? The Effect of the WISC-V Digitization Debacle

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Objective The WISC-V can now be administered in paper format or digitally. Though most subtests are comparable, Processing Speed Index (PSI) subtests, Coding and Symbol Search required complete redesign for digital presentation. We initially collected data to assess comparability of paper versus digital PSI tasks for future use. However, in March of 2020, Pearson issued an alert stating that, due to a programming error, Coding scores may be inflated secondary to timing inaccuracy; they advised against further use of digital Coding. We refocused our analyses to assess the degree to which inaccurate digital Coding impacted overall test results. Method Children with neurological disorders (N=104) received both versions of the PSI subtests (order randomized). Correlational analyses assessed relations between versions, t-tests assessed for administration order effects, and Kappa coefficients assessed agreement across platforms. Results Correlations between paper and digital subtests (r=.570 to .853) and composites (r=.848 to .987) were robust. As expected, Coding was higher digitally (difference=1.91, p < .01, d=.52), but Symbol Search, PSI, and FSIQ were comparable (p>.05). Given evident practice effects, subsequent analyses considered “first administered” versions and score range agreement was best when PSI tasks were administered digitally first (Kappa=.452, p < .001) versus paper first (Kappa=.153, p=.023). Agreement was strong for FSIQ regardless of order (Kappa≥.760, p < .001). Importantly, in highest stakes evaluations (i.e., presence versus absence of intellectual disability), agreement was extraordinarily strong (Kappa≥.93, p < .001). Conclusions Digital Coding scores are inflated in comparison to traditional paper version, but the impact of this programming error was minimal at the level of PSI and FSIQ.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A-245 So What's the Damage? The Effect of the WISC-V Digitization Debacle
Date Crossref
28/08/2020
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Sujets associés

Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.