Optimal error estimates and recovery technique of a mixed finite element method for nonlinear thermistor equations
Rattachement africain : cn, hk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract This paper is concerned with optimal error estimates and recovery technique of a classical mixed finite element method for the thermistor problem, which is governed by a parabolic/elliptic system with strong nonlinearity and coupling. The method is based on a popular combination of the lowest-order Raviart–Thomas mixed approximation for the electric potential/field $(\phi , \boldsymbol{\theta })$ and the linear Lagrange approximation for the temperature $u$. A common question is how the first-order approximation influences the accuracy of the second-order approximation to the temperature in such a strongly coupled system, while previous work only showed the first-order accuracy $O(h)$ for all three components in a traditional way. In this paper, we prove that the method produces the optimal second-order accuracy $O(h^2)$ for $u$ in the spatial direction, although the accuracy for the potential/field is in the order of $O(h)$. And more importantly, we propose a simple one-step recovery technique to obtain a new numerical electric potential/field of second-order accuracy. The analysis presented in this paper relies on an $H^{-1}$-norm estimate of the mixed finite element methods and analysis on a nonclassical elliptic map. We provide numerical experiments in both two- and three-dimensional spaces to confirm our theoretical analyses.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Optimal error estimates and recovery technique of a mixed finite element method for nonlinear thermistor equations
- Date Crossref
- 02/09/2020
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.