Associations of spousal communication with contraceptive method use among adolescent wives and their husbands in Niger

Résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine associations between spousal communication about contraception and ever use of modern contraception, overt modern contraceptive use (with husband's knowledge), and covert modern contraceptive use (without husband's knowledge) among adolescent wives and their husbands in Niger. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional data, from the Reaching Married Adolescents Study, were collected from randomly selected adolescent wives (ages 13-19 years) and their husbands from 48 randomly selected villages in rural Niger (N = 1,020 couples). Logistic regression models assessed associations of couples' reports of spousal communication about contraception with wives' reports of contraception (overall, overt, and covert). RESULTS: About one-fourth of adolescent wives and one-fifth of husbands reported spousal communication about contraception. Results showed couples' reports of spousal communication about contraception were positively associated with ever use of modern contraception. Couples' reports of spousal communication about contraception were negatively associated with covert modern contraceptive use compared to overt use. Wives' reports of spousal communication were marginally associated with covert use compared to no use but husbands' reports were not. CONCLUSION: Among a sample of couples in Niger, spousal communication about contraception was positively associated with modern contraceptive use (compared to no use) and negatively with covert use (compared to overt use) but wives' and husbands' reports showed differential associations with covert use compared to no use. Since there is little understanding of couple communication surrounding covert contraceptive use decisions, research should focus on characterizing content and context of couple communication particularly in cases of disagreement over fertility decisions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.