High-throughput investigation of molecular and cellular biomarkers in NMOSD
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To identify candidate biomarkers associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) using high-throughput technologies that broadly assay the concentrations of serum analytes and frequencies of immune cell subsets. METHODS: Sera, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and matched clinical data from participants with NMOSD and healthy controls (HCs) were obtained from the Collaborative International Research in Clinical and Longitudinal Experience Study NMOSD biorepository. Flow cytometry panels were used to measure the frequencies of 39 T-cell, B-cell, regulatory T-cell, monocyte, natural killer (NK) cell, and dendritic cell subsets in unstimulated PBMCs. In parallel, multiplex proteomics assays were used to measure 46 serum cytokines and chemokines in 2 independent NMOSD and HC cohorts. Multivariable regression models were used to assess molecular and cellular profiles in NMOSD compared with HC. RESULTS: NK cells. Both serum cohorts and multivariable logistic regression revealed increased levels of B-cell activating factor associated with NMOSD. Interleukin 6, CCL22, and CCL3 were also elevated in 1 NMOSD cohort of the 2 analyzed. Multivariable linear regression of serum analyte levels revealed a correlation between CX3CL1 (fractalkine) levels and the number of days since most recent disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: NK cells and CX3CL1 as potential novel biomarker candidates.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- High-throughput investigation of molecular and cellular biomarkers in NMOSD
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2020
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.