Coronavirus and Multiple Sclerosis, Autopsy and Biopsy and Choice of Therapy
Rattachement africain : se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Coronavirus in trigeminal nerve (TGN) has for decades been studied as a candidate neurotropic virus associated with multiple sclerosis (MS).The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in infected cases is challenging the whole immune system.The lesson from MS treatment and a new era of COVID-19 therapies are of value to review.Method: Searched databases to identify the strongest evidence of biopsy, autopsy, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), when using keywords MS and coronavirus, from January 1940 to April 2020.The result presents a solid knowledge of biopsy and autopsy for the association of COVID-19 and MS, then COVID-19 single and combination therapies being evaluated as presented in clinical use or clinical trials and compare common sites with MS.Results: All therapies with proven clinical efficacy against COVID-19 and its current deployment in COVID-19 and their common aspect with MS therapies (MSTR) and immunology are screened.Some MSTR despite some different side-effect e.g.risk for infection or cardiac arrest are candidates of being used as COVID-19 life-saving therapy.Conclusion: This global health disaster caused by airborne virus COVID-19, has created a new break to learn more about MS etiology and this airborne agent and future drug choices when reviewing the five months COVID-19 data through significant medical reports on World Wide Web.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Coronavirus and Multiple Sclerosis, Autopsy and Biopsy and Choice of Therapy
- Date Crossref
- 28/07/2020
- Éditeur
- Acta Scientific Publications Pvt. Ltd.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.