Optical Hemodynamic Imaging of Jugular Venous Dynamics During Altered Central Venous Pressure

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: An optical imaging system is proposed for quantitatively assessing jugular venous response to altered central venous pressure. METHODS: The proposed system assesses sub-surface optical absorption changes from jugular venous waveforms with a spatial calibration procedure to normalize incident tissue illumination. Widefield frames of the right lateral neck were captured and calibrated using a novel flexible surface calibration method. A hemodynamic optical model was derived to quantify jugular venous optical attenuation (JVA) signals, and generate a spatial jugular venous pulsatility map. JVA was assessed in three cardiovascular protocols that altered central venous pressure: acute central hypovolemia (lower body negative pressure), venous congestion (head-down tilt), and impaired cardiac filling (Valsalva maneuver). RESULTS: JVA waveforms exhibited biphasic wave properties consistent with jugular venous pulse dynamics when time-aligned with an electrocardiogram. JVA correlated strongly (median, interquartile range) with invasive central venous pressure during graded central hypovolemia (r = 0.85, [0.72, 0.95]), graded venous congestion (r = 0.94, [0.84, 0.99]), and impaired cardiac filling (r = 0.94, [0.85, 0.99]). Reduced JVA during graded acute hypovolemia was strongly correlated with reductions in stroke volume (SV) (r = 0.85, [0.76, 0.92]) from baseline (SV: 79 ± 15 mL, JVA: 0.56 ± 0.10 a.u.) to -40 mmHg suction (SV: 59 ± 18 mL, JVA: 0.47 ± 0.05 a.u.; p 0.01). CONCLUSION: The proposed non-contact optical imaging system demonstrated jugular venous dynamics consistent with invasive central venous monitoring during three protocols that altered central venous pressure. SIGNIFICANCE: This system provides non-invasive monitoring of pressure-induced jugular venous dynamics in clinically relevant conditions where catheterization is traditionally required, enabling monitoring in non-surgical environments.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.