Checkpoint Inhibition for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Chemotherapy—Real-World Clinical Impressions and Comparative Review of the Literature
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: The introduction of checkpoint inhibitors is a long-awaited new option for a urothelial cancer with a poor prognosis. Apart from clinical studies, the data on real world experience is scarce. Methods: Patients for monotherapy with either Atezolizumab, Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab after chemotherapy were included. Adverse events and immune related adverse events as well as survival data and imaging analyses were recorded in a prospectively designed multi-center data base. Duration of response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 17 patients were included. The median follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.7 - 29.8 months). Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI, 2.3 - NA months). Median OS for all patients was 8.3 months (95% CI, 3.4 - NA months). Overall response rate (ORR) was 23.5% (4 out of 17 patients). Adverse events were recorded in 11 (64.7%) of patients. Higher grade adverse events (≥Grade 3) were present in 4 (23.5%) patients. No therapy related deaths occurred during the observation period. A total of 7 (41.2%) patients had adverse events that were considered to be immune related. Conclusion: Our real-world clinical series confirms an objective response for about every fifth patient, promising OS and a low incidence for severe adverse events (≥Grade 3).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Checkpoint Inhibition for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Chemotherapy—Real-World Clinical Impressions and Comparative Review of the Literature
- Date Crossref
- 21/05/2020
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.