Evaluation of the safety of ramucirumab in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer
Rattachement africain : jp, tw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
As a result of the RAINBOW trial, ramucirumab plus paclitaxel was established as a second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Regarding the safety of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in the Japanese, a subgroup analysis of the RAINBOW trial was conducted. The incidence of neutropenia was higher in Japanese patients. However, information is lacking concerning the safety of ramucirumab after marketing in Japanese patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of ramucirumab in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer who had commenced treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel or paclitaxel only at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Gifu, Japan) between January 2015 and December 2016. There were 26 patients in the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel group and 22 patients in the paclitaxel only group. Treatment-related adverse events were documented in 100.0% of the patients in the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel group (Grade 3-4, 73.1%) and 90.9 % of the patients in the paclitaxel only group (Grade 3-4, 45.5 %). The most frequently observed adverse event in both treatment groups was anemia. The second common adverse event was neutropenia. The incidence of neutropenia of Grade ≥3 was significantly higher in the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel only group. In conclusion, the incidence of neutropenia is high. However, we believe that ramucirumab plus paclitaxel can be safely administered.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of the safety of ramucirumab in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2018
- Éditeur
- IMR Press
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.