A radio continuum and polarization study of the pulsar wind nebula CTB 87 (G74.9+1.2)
Rattachement africain : ca, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT We present radio continuum and linear polarization observations of the pulsar wind nebula (PWN) CTB 87 (G74.9+1.2) with the Effelsberg 100-m Radio Telescope between 4.75 and 32 GHz. An analysis of these new data including archived low-frequency observations at 1420 and 408 MHz from the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey shows that CTB 87 consists of two distinct emission components: a compact kidney-shaped component, 14 × 8.5 pc2 (7.8 × 4.8 arcmin2) in size and a larger diffuse, spherical, and centrally peaked component of about 30 pc (17 arcmin) in diameter. The kidney-shaped component with a much steeper radio continuum spectrum is highly linearly polarized and likely represents a relic PWN. The diffuse component represents the undisturbed part of the PWN expanding inside a cavity or stellar wind bubble. The previously reported spectral break above 10 GHz is likely the result of missing large-scale emission and insufficient sensitivity of the high-frequency radio continuum observations. The simulation of the system’s evolution yields an age of about 18 000 yr as the result of a Type II supernova explosion with ejecta mass of about 12 M⊙ and explosion energy of about 7 × 1050 erg. We also found evidence for a radio shell in our polarization data that represents the blast wave that entered the molecular cloud complex at a radius of about 13 pc.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A radio continuum and polarization study of the pulsar wind nebula CTB 87 (G74.9+1.2)
- Date Crossref
- 11/06/2020
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.