Epigenome-wide association meta-analysis of DNA methylation with coffee and tea consumption
Rattachement africain : nl, lu, us, de, in, gb, fr, it, tw. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Coffee and tea are extensively consumed beverages worldwide. Observational studies have shown contradictory findings for the association between consumption of these beverages and different health outcomes. Epigenetics is suggested as a mechanism mediating the effects of dietary and lifestyle factors on disease onset. We conducted epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) on coffee and tea consumptions in 15,789 participants of European and African-American ancestries from 15 cohorts. EWAS meta-analysis revealed 11 CpG sites significantly associated with coffee consumption ( P -value <1.1×10 -7 ), nine of them annotated to the genes AHRR, F2RL3, FLJ43663, HDAC4, GFI1 and PHGDH , and two CpGs suggestively associated with tea consumption ( P -value<5.0×10 -6 ). Among these, cg14476101 was significantly associated with expression of its annotated gene PHGDH and risk of fatty liver disease. Knockdown of PHGDH expression in liver cells showed a correlation with expression levels of lipid-associated genes, suggesting a role of PHGDH in hepatic-lipid metabolism. Collectively, this study indicates that coffee consumption is associated with differential DNA methylation levels at multiple CpGs, and that coffee-associated epigenetic variations may explain the mechanism of action of coffee consumption in conferring disease risk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Epigenome-wide association meta-analysis of DNA methylation with coffee and tea consumption
- Date Crossref
- 15/04/2020
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.