Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2020 preprint

Complexity and performance of temperature-based snow routines for runoff modelling in mountainous areas in Central Europe

9Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : se, ch, cz, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract. Snow processes are a key component of the water cycle in mountainous areas as well as in many areas of the mid- and high latitudes of the Earth. The complexity of these processes, coupled with the limited data available on them, has led to the development of different modelling approaches to improve their understanding and support management practices. Physically-based approaches, such as the energy balance method, provide the best representation of these processes but at the expense of high data requirements. Data limitations, in most situations, constrain the use of these methods in favour of more simple approaches. The temperature-index method is the most widely-used modelling approach of the snowpack processes for hydrological modelling, with many variants implemented in different models. However, in many cases, the decisions on the most suitable complexity of these conceptualisations are not adequately assessed for a given model structure, application, or decision-making support tool. In this study, we assessed model structure choices of the HBV model, a popular semi-distributed, bucket-type hydrological model, for its application in mountainous areas in Central Europe. To this end, we reviewed the most widely-used choices to different components of the snow routine in different hydrological models and proposed a series of modifications to the structure of HBV. We constrained the choice of modifications to those that are aligned with HBV’s modelling approach of keeping processes as simple as possible to constrain model complexity. We analysed a total of 64 alternative snow routine structures over 54 catchments using a split-sample test. We found that using (a) an exponential snowmelt function coupled with no refreezing instead of a linear function for both processes and (b) a seasonally-variable degree-day factor instead of a constant one were, overall, the most valuable modifications to the model. Additionally, we found that increasing model complexity does not necessarily lead to improved model performance per se. Instead, we found that a thorough analysis of the different processes included in the model and their optimal degree of realism for a given application is a preferable alternative. While the results may not be transferrable to other modelling purposes or geographical domains, the methodology presented here may be used to assess the suitability of model design choices.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Complexity and performance of temperature-based snow routines for runoff modelling in mountainous areas in Central Europe
Date Crossref
13/02/2020
Éditeur
Copernicus GmbH
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • University of Zurich Department of Geography pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Charles University Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Center for Snow and Avalanche Studies pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public

Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Department of Geography — University of Zurich et Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology — Charles University, avec 2 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cryospheric studies and observationsHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesClimate change and permafrost

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.