Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2020 preprint

Identifying Nootropic Drug Targets via Large-Scale Cognitive GWAS and Transcriptomics

7Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
59Institutions déclarées
10Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, sg, cn, gb, no, fi, de, gr, ca, ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Cognitive traits demonstrate significant genetic correlations with many psychiatric disorders and other health-related traits. Many neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders are marked by cognitive deficits. Therefore, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of general cognitive ability might suggest potential targets for nootropic drug repurposing. Our previous effort to identify “druggable genes” (i.e., GWAS-identified genes that produce proteins targeted by known small molecules) was modestly powered due to the small cognitive GWAS sample available at the time. Since then, two large cognitive GWAS meta-analyses have reported 148 and 205 genome-wide significant loci, respectively. Additionally, large-scale gene expression databases, derived from post-mortem human brain, have recently been made available for GWAS annotation. Here, we 1) reconcile results from these two cognitive GWAS meta-analyses to further enhance power for locus discovery; 2) employ several complementary transcriptomic methods to identify genes in these loci with variants that are credibly associated with cognition; and 3) further annotate the resulting genes to identify “druggable” targets. Methods GWAS summary statistics were harmonized and jointly analysed using Multi-Trait Analysis of GWAS [MTAG], which is optimized for handling sample overlaps. Downstream gene identification was carried out using MAGMA, S-PrediXcan/S-TissueXcan Transcriptomic Wide Analysis, and eQTL mapping, as well as more recently developed methods that integrate GWAS and eQTL data via Summary-statistics Mendelian Randomization [SMR] and linkage methods [HEIDI], Available brain-specific eQTL databases included GTEXv7, BrainEAC, CommonMind, ROSMAP, and PsychENCODE. Intersecting credible genes were then annotated against multiple chemoinformatic databases [DGIdb, K I , and a published review on “druggability”]. Results Using our meta-analytic data set (N = 373,617) we identified 241 independent cognition-associated loci (29 novel), and 76 genes were identified by 2 or more methods of gene identification. 26 genes were associated with general cognitive ability via SMR, 16 genes via STissueXcan/S-PrediXcan, 47 genes via eQTL mapping, and 68 genes via MAGMA pathway analysis. The use of the HEIDI test permitted the exclusion of candidate genes that may have been artifactually associated to cognition due to linkage, rather than direct causal or indirect pleiotropic effects. Actin and chromatin binding gene sets were identified as novel pathways that could be targeted via drug repurposing. Leveraging on our various transcriptome and pathway analyses, as well as available chemoinformatic databases, we identified 16 putative genes that may suggest drug targets with nootropic properties. Discussion Results converged on several categories of significant drug targets, including serotonergic and glutamatergic genes, voltage-gated ion channel genes, carbonic anhydrase genes, and phosphodiesterase genes. The current results represent the first efforts to apply a multi-method approach to integrate gene expression and SNP level data to identify credible actionable genes for general cognitive ability.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Identifying Nootropic Drug Targets via Large-Scale Cognitive GWAS and Transcriptomics
Date Crossref
06/02/2020
Éditeur
openRxiv
Type
posted-content

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Broad InstituteMassachusetts General HospitalInstitute of Mental HealthZucker Hillside HospitalBiogen (United States)Central South UniversitySUNY Upstate Medical UniversityNHS LothianUniversity of EdinburghUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBoston Children's HospitalHartford HospitalHarvard UniversityHartford Financial Services (United States)Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiOslo University HospitalUniversity of BergenHaukeland University HospitalUniversity of OsloFeinstein Institute for Medical ResearchHofstra UniversityUniversity of HelsinkiInstitute for Molecular Medicine FinlandHelsinki University HospitalWellcome Sanger InstituteNational University of SingaporeFolkhälsans ForskningscentrumMartin Luther University Halle-WittenbergJames J. Peters VA Medical CenterUniversity of CreteBrigham and Women's HospitalUniversity of ManchesterManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchester Academic Health Science CentreDuke Medical CenterDuke University HospitalQueen Mary University of LondonWilliam Harvey Research InstituteHelix (United States)Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversity Mental Health Research InstituteEginition HospitalJohns Hopkins UniversityJohns Hopkins MedicineYale UniversityPalo Alto UniversityStanford UniversityUniversity of Oregon23andMe (United States)Duke UniversityNational Institute of Mental HealthLieber Institute for Brain DevelopmentOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of GalwayTrinity College DublinSalford Royal NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of the Arts HelsinkiUniversity of Colorado Boulder

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.