Preparation for practice and the arguments for standardisation in view of the forthcoming medical licensing exam: A literature review
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aims: The aim of this paper is to address whether the introduction of a national licensing exam will improve preparedness for practice. This review will explore and identify the areas in which UK medical graduates are feeling underprepared. In addition, this review will discuss the need for the Medical Licensing Assessment in the UK.Methods: A literature search of several databases was performed in December 2018. Studies which identified the areas in which medical graduates were prepared/unprepared for, and those which explored whether UK medical schools were adequately preparing their graduates for practice, were included. Studies exploring the preparedness of international medical graduates were excluded.Results: Sixteen articles met the final inclusion criteria and are included in this review. All the final studies are cross-sectional and are varied in their use of methods used, with the vast majority using questionnaires to identify the preparedness of medical students and junior doctors.Conclusions: This review conveys that junior doctors are mostly underprepared in emergency work. This can be associated to a lack of exposure to emergency situations during their undergraduate training. Moreover, this review suggests that the preparedness of medical graduates may remain unaffected by the implementation of the MLA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Preparation for practice and the arguments for standardisation in view of the forthcoming medical licensing exam: A literature review
- Date Crossref
- 11/01/2020
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.