Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) frequently coexists with other autoimmune diseases, including celiac disease (CeD). Although the prevalence of CeD is high among cohorts with PBC, few studies have directly compared this prevalence to those among individuals with other liver diseases (OLD). Aim To compare the prevalence of CeD between a cohort with PBC and a cohort with OLD. Methods Retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2016. All consecutive patients with an anti-transglutaminase (tTG) assay requested by a hepatologist and a diagnosis of chronic liver disease were included. CeD diagnosis was confirmed by duodenal biopsies. Results We included 399 consecutive patients (53.1 years SD 14.0, 54.1% women), notably 51 individuals with PBC and 348 individuals with OLD. PBC group included significantly more women (90.2% versus 48.9% P < 0.0001). The prevalence of CeD was higher in the group with PBC compared to the group with OLD (11.8 versus 2.9%, P < 0.003). In the OLD group, the prevalence of CeD was comparable regardless of the etiologic subgroup (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis 2.7% versus alcoholic liver disease 4.3%, versus viral 1.5% versus other autoimmune liver diseases 3.3%, NS). The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms at the time of the tTG assay was comparable between PBC and OLD groups (31.4 versus 29.6%, NS). Conclusion There is a higher prevalence of CeD in the PBC group compared to other liver diseases.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis
- Date Crossref
- 02/01/2020
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.