Absence of a microbiome in the midgut trunk of six representative Crustacea
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract It has become a common expectation for an animal’s guts to be a site for bacterial symbiosis, which may play a role in influencing various aspects of physiology including digestion and immune responses. The presence of a microbiome in the digestive tracts of crustaceans has been demonstrated in the past using molecular techniques and has encouraged manipulations including probiotics to enhance growth rates in cultured species. We suggest, however, that bacteria are restricted to the lumen of the gut and separated from the epithelium by the peritrophic matrix, which prevents their establishment as a permanent component of the gut. The peritrophic matrix, found in most arthropods, is a chitinous sheet containing accessory molecules, and is continuously formed by delamination from the epithelium of the midgut such that the actual surface is constantly being cleaned. The lifted layer then surrounds ingested materials, including microbes, in an impenetrable wrapper compartmentalizing digestive and immune functions. The ectoperitrophic space, lying between the peritrophic matrix and the epithelium, was examined in six species representatives of six groups of crustaceans (Branchiopoda, Amphipoda, Copepoda, and Decapoda) for the presence of microbes using light and transmission electron microscopy as well as fluorescent probes for bacteria. The results suggest that a microbiome is lacking in several common groups of crustaceans.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Absence of a microbiome in the midgut trunk of six representative Crustacea
- Date Crossref
- 04/12/2019
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.