Endothelial cell-derived microparticles as potential biomarkers in chronic interstitial lung diseases
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: Cell-derived microparticles (MP) are extracellular vesicles released by cells in a variety of physiological and pathological conditions. A role for endothelial cell-derived MP (EMP) as both pathogenetic effectors and biomarkers of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) has been postulated. Aim: To investigate the potential role of EMP as a biomarkers in PF. Patients and Methods: 14 consecutive patients with interstitial lung disease and 18 normal individuals were investigated. Platelet poor plasma was obtained by two subsequent centrifugations: 1,500 xg for 15 minutes and 13,000 xg for 2 minutes. EMP were analysed by FACS and discriminated first by size, as events conforming to a light scatter distribution within the 0.5-0.9 μm range and further identifies them as annexin V, carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE), CD62e and CD31 positive events. A ROC curve was built to describe the potential diagnostic power of this approach. Results: The number of EMP was significantly higher in the PF group compared to controls (Fig 1a; mean±SEM;**p<0.001). Figure 1b shows the ROC curve. Area under the curve was 0.95±0.04 (SE); p<0.0001. An arbitrary cut-off of 104 events/min corresponded to a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 83% and a likelihood ratio of 5.57. Conclusions: The results of this preliminary pilot study confirm a potential role for EMP as a biomarker for PF and warrant further research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Endothelial cell-derived microparticles as potential biomarkers in chronic interstitial lung diseases
- Date Crossref
- 28/09/2019
- Éditeur
- European Respiratory Society
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.