An innovation systems approach to understanding the impacts of grass grub damage in irrigated Canterbury dairy pastures
Rattachement africain : nz, us, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
An innovation systems approach involving agribusiness representatives, researchers and farmers identified that damage caused by grass grub (Costelytra giveni) was a key factor contributing to areas of reduced yield within high-producing pastures. Using a recognised yield mapping technique, areas of ‘Low’ and ‘High’ pasture height were identified in different paddocks over 3 years; ‘Low’ areas had significantly higher numbers of grass grub larvae than ‘High’ areas. Pasture production was measured for the ‘Low’ and ‘High’ pasture height areas, and the difference was calculated to be 6800 kg DM/ha for 2018/19. This difference persisted after grass grub larvae were no longer active. Farm systems modelling analysis estimated this ‘yield gap’ led to a $650/ha/year difference in profit. A survey of farmer perceptions of grass grub damage on 23 central Canterbury dairy farms estimated 19% of pastures were affected by grass grub, with 11% of the area in those paddocks being damaged. Econometric modelling showed differences in farmer perceptions of grass grub damage. Data from the survey and the pasture measurements were combined with the farm systems modelling results to estimate a $1,870,000/year regional-scale impact of the ‘yield gap’. An integrated pest management approach is suggested to control grass grub damage.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An innovation systems approach to understanding the impacts of grass grub damage in irrigated Canterbury dairy pastures
- Date Crossref
- 28/10/2019
- Éditeur
- New Zealand Grassland Association
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
AgResearch pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Lincoln University - Pennsylvania pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Ravensburg University of Cooperative Education pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Ravensdown pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
AgResearch, Lincoln University - Pennsylvania et Ravensburg University of Cooperative Education, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.