Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2019 article

Microbiology of Incisional Surgical Site Infection

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : bd. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Bacteria responsible for causing lncisional Surgical Site Infection (ISSI) along with their resistance pattern changes over time due to various factors and are a matter of regular scrutiny. Proper understanding of this will help both surgeon and microbiologist to formulate an effective guideline to combat overall SSI. Objectives: To evaluate responsible microorganisms and their resistance pattern causing ISSI following elective gastrointestinal surgery in our perspective. Methods: Prospective data were collected on 1122 surgical patients admitted in the surgery department in BSMMU from January 201 O to June 2012 having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Patients operated were followed in the post operative period till discharge and if any ISSI noted, swab from the site of infection was sent for culture and sensitivity reporting using standard bacteriological techniques. Antibiotics were given accordingly. Results: In this series 1122 wounds were studied of which183(16.31%) cases had ISSI.Wound infection rates, according to clinical wound types were 10.45%, 14.49%, 49% for clean-contaminated,contaminated and dirty wounds respectively. The figures of ISSI according to SSI types were 76.77% for Superficial SSI and 26.23% for Deep SSI.The figures of ISSI according to SSI types were 76.77% for Superficial SSI and 26.23% for Deep SSI. Causative microorganisms were revealed in 74.87% positive cultures. 5.8% wounds had polymicrobial etiology. The common causative organisms were Escherichia coli 55.5%,Staphylococcus aureus 22.6%, Pseudomonas spp. 9.5% and Klebsiella spp. 6.6%.AII were 100% sensitive to Meropenem. Next to this Escherichia coli and Klebsiellaspp. were mostly sensitive to Ceftriaxone 62.5% and 100% respectively, Staphylococcus aureus to Doxicycline 75% and Pseudomonas spp. to Ceftazidime 93.7%. Comparison with previously done national and international studies revealed alarming increase in resistance pattern of causative bacterial isolates. Conclusion: To date no national or in house SSI prevention policy or surveillance guideline exists. Lack of our attention in this issue along with inept, irrational use of antibiotics is definitely adding causative organisms to gain increasing resistance pattern. Before surgical care centers are overwhelmed with SSls by resistant organisms caution must be taken from all level. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2013) Vol. 17 (1) : 18-24

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Microbiology of Incisional Surgical Site Infection
Date Crossref
27/10/2019
Éditeur
Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Surgical site infection preventionSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesWound Healing and Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.