Long‐term results of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment vs Limberg flap for treatment of difficult cases of complicated pilonidal disease: a prospective, nonrandomized study

Le résumé fourni par la source

AIM: To present the results of a prospective, nonrandomized comparative study on the treatment of complicated pilonidal sinus by endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) compared with Limberg flap surgery, based on experience of a single surgical centre. METHOD: A prospective, nonrandomized comparative study. Long-term follow-up of 62 patients with complicated pilonidal disease was analysed (36 operated on using the Limberg flap technique and 26 using the EPSiT method). The median follow-up was 27 months (12-44). RESULTS: The median operating time in the EPSiT group was 60 min (25-80 min) and in the Limberg group 67 min (35-95 min). In the EPSiT group, primary healing was achieved in 22 out of 26 patients (84.6%) in a median of 42 days with a total complication rate of 11.5%. There were seven recurrences after initial healing. The total success rate of the EPSiT procedure with long-term follow-up was 57.7%. In the Limberg flap group, all patients healed (100%) in a median of 21 days. The complication rate in this group was 26.5%, and there were two recurrences in this group. The total success rate of the Limberg flap procedure was 94.1%. CONCLUSION: For patients with complicated pilonidal sinus, the endoscopic procedure has a significantly lower success rate than the Limberg flap procedure, but a lower risk of complications. Such patients should be offered a choice between a safer, minimally invasive procedure with a higher risk of recurrence or flap surgery, which is more effective, but with a higher risk of complications.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.