Nasal shedding of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in wild boar is related to generalised tuberculosis and concomitant infections
Résumé fourni par la source
Background Wild boar is an important reservoir of Mycobacterium tuberculosis variant bovis , the main causative agent of bovine tuberculosis (bTB). A proportion of tuberculosis (TB)‐affected wild boars shed M tuberculosis by nasal route, favouring the maintenance of bTB in a multihost scenario. The aim of this work was to assess if M tuberculosis nasal excretion is influenced by factors commonly associated with high TB prevalence in wild boar. Methods TB diagnosis and M tuberculosis isolation were carried out in 112 hunted wild boars from mid‐western Spain. The association between the presence of M tuberculosis DNA in nasal secretions and explanatory factors was explored using partial least squares regression (PLSR) approaches. Results DNA from M tuberculosis was detected in 40.8 per cent nasal secretions of the TB‐affected animals. Explanatory factors provided a first significant PLSR X's component, explaining 25.70 per cent of the variability observed in M tuberculosis nasal shedding. The presence of M tuberculosis in nasal secretions is more probable in animals suffering from generalised TB and mainly coinfected with Metastrongylus species and porcine circovirus type 2, explaining nearly 90 per cent of the total variance of this model. Conclusion Measures aiming to control these factors could be useful to reduce M tuberculosis shedding in wild boar.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Nasal shedding of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> in wild boar is related to generalised tuberculosis and concomitant infections
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2019
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.