Factors affecting the survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin
Résumé fourni par la source
One of the main problems in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is the adequate selection of patients for cytoreductive surgery (CS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). AIM: To determine the predictive factors of overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in CRC patients with PC after CS with HIPEC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2010 to 2018 years 102 patients with CRC and PC were included in the study. The cytoreduction was complete (CC0, according to Sugabaker scale) in 96 (94.2%) cases. The age median of patients was 65 years. There were 63 (62%) women. In 81 (79%) patients, the PC was synchronous. The median level of CEA was 8.5 ng/ml. The median peritoneal carcinomatous index (PCI) was 3 (1-23). RESULTS: The median of follow-up was 18 (11; 33) months. The median of DFS and OS were 13 (9;31) and 32 (17; n/d) months, respectively. Multifactorial Cox-regression analysis showed the localization of the primary tumor in the right colon (OR=1.66; 95% CI 1.1-2.5; p=0.013) and the level of the PCI (OR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.024-1.15; p=0.008) were independent negative factors of OS. CONCLUSION: The CS and HIPEC in patients with CRC with PC allowes to achieve five-year survival in a part of patients, especially with low PCI. Identifying adverse prognostic factors preoperatively can help in selecting patients for CS in the future.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Factors affecting the survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2019
- Éditeur
- Media Sphere Publishing House
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.