Accountability in patient adherence
Rattachement africain : us, ca, dk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The accountability inherent in the social interaction between a patient and healthcare provider affects patients' motivation to adhere to treatment. To characterize the role of accountability as a tool to improve self-efficacy and self-management and thereby promote patients' adherence to treatment, a measure of accountability is needed. AIMS: To develop and test the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of a new outcome measure designed to assess accountability. METHODS: The accountability measurement tool was developed from the literature, expert consultation, and focus groups. A focus group and three pilot studies were performed both in clinic and through an online crowdsourcing platform. Principal Component Analysis evaluated constructs, and Cronbach's alpha measured internal consistency. Validity was established using convergent and divergent correlations to other validated scales. RESULTS: A total of 292 participants took part in this study. The 12-item accountability scale demonstrated very good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.92). Components of the accountability measurement tool correlated with predicted validated measures, including the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire. Divergent validity was established with no significant difference noted between age, sex, race, and education level. CONCLUSION: Future use of this questionnaire will allow for the assessment of the interaction between accountability and adherence to treatment and lead to the development of new interventions to promote better adherence.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- <p>Accountability in patient adherence</p>
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2019
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Wake Forest University Department of Psychology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
McGill University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Southern Denmark Department of Dermatology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Wake Forest School of Medicine Department of Dermatology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Department of Psychology — Wake Forest University, McGill University et Department of Dermatology — University of Southern Denmark, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.