Cilostazol inhibits hyperglucose-induced vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction by modulating the RAGE/ERK/NF-κB signaling pathways

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that high glucose (HG) causes abnormalities in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function (VSMC) and contributes to atherosclerosis. Receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) has been linked to the pathogenesis of both the macrovascular and microvascular complications of diabetes. Cilostazol is used to treat diabetic vasculopathy by ameliorating HG-induced vascular dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigated whether the cilostazol suppression of HG-induced VSMC dysfunction is through RAGE signaling and its possible regulation mechanism. METHOD: We investigated the effect of HG and cilostazol on RAGE signaling in A7r5 rat VSMCs. Aortic tissues of streptozotocin (STZ) diabetic mice were also collected. RESULTS: Aortic tissue samples from the diabetic mice exhibited a significantly decreased RAGE expression after cilostazol treatment. HG increased RAGE, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) expressions, and was accompanied with increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), cell proliferation, adhesion and migration. Cilostazol significantly reversed HG-induced RAGE, ROS, downstream gene expressions and cell functions. RAGE knockdown significantly reversed the expressions of HG-induced vasculopathy related gene expressions and cell functions. Cilostazol with RAGE knockdown had additive effects on downstream ERK/NF-κB signaling pathways, gene expressions and cell functions of A7r5 rat VSMCs in HG culture. CONCLUSIONS: Both in vitro and in vivo experimental diabetes models showed novel signal transduction of cilostazol-mediated protection against HG-related VSMC dysfunction, and highlighted the involvement of RAGE signaling and downstream pathways.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.