Review of Resource-Constrained Scheduling Algorithms
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
On a regular basis, project managers concentrate their efforts on critical and near-critical activities. However, the concepts of total float and critical path lose their significance after applying resource-constrained scheduling (RCS) techniques. RCS techniques mitigate the resource supply-demand problem but break the critical path. As a result, several algorithms have been developed to identify a continuous critical path in resource-constrained schedules. This study reviews and evaluates the performance of eight RCS-related algorithms with the purpose of identifying the shortcomings that must be addressed so they can be applied for delay analysis. The review shows that a systematic procedure is needed to (1) incorporate and handle dynamic resource links when the schedule is updated, and (2) select a potential resource links configuration. Addressing these limitations will make the algorithms more practical for real construction and engineering projects and will allow a more realistic delay analysis since schedules will reflect the real conditions of the project (resource loaded). This study (1) discusses potential solutions to the shortcomings of the existing algorithms, (2) provides recommendations on the methods that can be used by industry professionals, and (3) proposes a system to facilitate the selection of an algorithm based on the common features (heuristic), constraints (removal of logic links), and project characteristics (resources and calendars).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Review of Resource-Constrained Scheduling Algorithms
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2019
- Éditeur
- American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Virginia Tech pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Ph.D. Candidate pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Vecellio Professor pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Virginia Tech, Ph.D. Candidate et Vecellio Professor.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.