Retrospective analysis of 132 patients with stage I seminoma: Observation versus adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy in a single institution.
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
e15033 Background: Classically, radiotherapy (RT) has been the standard adjuvant treatment for stage I seminoma patients. Improvements in early relapse diagnosis have led high cure rates. Two cycles of adjuvant carboplatin present similar efficacy to radiotherapy with less toxicity have led to re-examination of the standard treatment approach. Methods: Retrospective study of 132 patients diagnosed with stage I seminoma from 1980-2010 who received whether treatment with RT, chemotherapy (Cht) or active surveillance (AS) after orchiectomy at one Universitary Hospital. The objective was to determine the relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease -specific survival (DSS). Results: Of the 132 patients, 68 were treated with prophylactic irradiation (paraaortic ± pelvic nodes, the median total dose radiation 26 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction), 33 with adjuvant chemotherapy (31 had carboplatin x 2, 2 had BEP x 2), and 31 underwent surveillance. Among the RT patients (median follow-up 121months), mean age was 40 years (range: 20-70) with mean tumor size of 5.5 cm (range: 1-14). 6% of them had rete testis involvement and 15% vascular invasion. There was 1 relapse with a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 103 months and no deaths from seminoma. RFS was 98% at 10 years. OS and DSS were 100% at 10years. Among the chemotherapy patients mean age was 30 years (range: 18-66) with mean tumor size of 6,18cm (range: 1,5-10). 9% of them had rete testis involvement and 60 % vascular invasion. With a median follow-up of 66 months, there was 1 relapse. Five-year RFS was 97%, OS and DSS were 100%. Among the observation patients (median follow-up 148 months), mean age was 35 years (range: 20-78) with mean tumor size of 3,7cm (range: 1,3-7). 6% of them had rete testis involvement and 6 % vascular invasion. There were 6 relapses with no deaths from seminoma. RFS was 80%, specific OS and DSS was 100% at 10 years. Of the patients who relapsed, all were rendered disease-free with chemotherapy; with non evidence disease at last follow-up. Conclusions: Consistent with published trials both radiotherapy, chemotherapy or active surveillance are safe and effective treatments with similar oncologic results.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Retrospective analysis of 132 patients with stage I seminoma: Observation versus adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy in a single institution.
- Date Crossref
- 20/05/2012
- Éditeur
- American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre Medical Oncology Service pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Medical Oncology Service — Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.