Comparison of glucose tolerance between wild-type mice and mice with double knockout of neuromedin U and neuromedin S
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Recently, it has been proposed that neuromedin U (NMU) is "decretin", which suppresses insulin secretion from the pancreas in vitro. Here we examined the possible involvement of NMU in insulin secretion in vivo by comparing the plasma glucose and insulin levels of wild-type mice with those of double knockout (D-KO) of the NMU and neuromedin S (NMS) genes, as NMS binds to the neuromedin U receptor. If NMU is, in fact, "decretin", which inhibits insulin secretion from the pancreas, then NMU-deficient mice might result in higher plasma insulin levels than is the case in wild-type mice, or injection of NMU lead to suppression of plasma insulin level. In this study, we found that the fasting plasma level of insulin was not increased in D-KO mice. Glucose tolerance tests revealed no significant difference in plasma insulin levels between wild-type mice and D-KO mice under non-fasting conditions. After peripheral injection of NMU, plasma glucose and insulin levels did not show any significant changes in either wild-type or D-KO mice. Glucose tolerance testing after 3 weeks of high fat feeding revealed no significant difference in plasma insulin levels during 60 min after glucose injection between wild-type and D-KO mice. These results suggest that even if NMU is a decretin candidate, its physiological involvement in suppression of insulin secretion may be very minor in vivo.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of glucose tolerance between wild-type mice and mice with double knockout of neuromedin U and neuromedin S
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2019
- Éditeur
- Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.