DOZ047.92: Oesophageal atresia: a multicenter retrospective study on surgical treatment and 1-year follow-up
Rattachement africain : be, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Introduction No data are available on surgical management and outcomes of oesophageal atresia (OA) in Belgium. In collaboration with the Belgian Association of Paediatric Surgery (BELAPS) a retrospective study was organized to analyze data from children born with OA, with a 1-year follow-up. Materials and Methods Out of 17 centers in Belgium, 10 participated in this study. A novel checklist to collect data from OA patients born between the 1st of January 2010 and the 1st of January 2015 was created. Gross type A, B, C and D OA were included. Results One hundred children were included. Gross type C OA was seen in 86%. Associated malformations were present in 73%, most frequently cardiac malformations (52%). There was consensus regarding preoperative investigations, anastomotic technique, and transanastomotic tube placement. There was no consensus regarding genetic counseling, placement of a chest tube, and start of enteral feeding. There were six deaths in the first year of life. The majority of patients needed rehospitalization during the first year of life (85.9%) and there was a high occurrence of anastomotic strictures (51.6%). Conclusions This is the first study about management and outcome of OA in Belgium. Although the 1-year survival rate is high (93.8%), these data illustrate that OA has an important morbidity. Multidisciplinary follow-up and prospective studies/registries with longer follow-up are needed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- DOZ047.92: Oesophageal atresia: a multicenter retrospective study on surgical treatment and 1-year follow-up
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2019
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.