Class I and II histone deacetylase expression is not altered in human amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Neuropathological and positron emission tomography molecular neuroimaging evidence
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Introduction There is an unmet need for mechanism‐based biomarkers and effective disease modifying treatments in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Previous findings have provided evidence that histone deacetylases (HDAC) are altered in ALS, providing a rationale for testing HDAC inhibitors as a therapeutic option. Methods We measured class I and II HDAC protein and transcript levels together with acetylation levels of downstream substrates by using Western blotting in postmortem tissue of ALS and controls. [11C]Martinostat, a novel HDAC positron emission tomography ligand, was also used to assess in vivo brain HDAC alterations in patients with ALS and healthy controls (HC). Results There was no significant difference in HDAC levels between patients with ALS and controls as measured by Western blotting and reverse‐transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Similarly, no differences were detected in [11C]Martinostat–positron emission tomography uptake in ALS participants compared with HCs. Discussion These findings provide evidence that alterations in HDAC isoforms are not a dominant pathological feature at the bulk tissue level in ALS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Class I and II histone deacetylase expression is not altered in human amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Neuropathological and positron emission tomography molecular neuroimaging evidence
- Date Crossref
- 16/07/2019
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.