230Anderson-Fabry disease: beyond what "eyes can see"
Rattachement africain : pt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) plays a major role in the assessment of cardiac involvement in Anderson-Fabry (ADF) disease and in subsequent therapeutic decisions. CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT) allows a fast and accurate assessment of strain analysis avoiding the need of additional sequences. Purpose: assess the utility of CMR-FT in the evaluation of the cardiac involvement by AFD. Methods: included seventy-six consecutive genetically proven ADF patients, from a single reference center, and thirty-nine controls (matching for age and sex). The participants provided written informed consent. CMR-FT was performed by a level III operator using a dedicated software. Results: Globally, AFD patients had worse strain results (table 1). But even patients both without left ventricle hypertrophy and without presence of late gadolinium enhancement (52.6%) had worse results when comparing to controls (values not presented). In this particular sub-group, parameters with higher area under the curve (AUC) were longitudinal strain rate (p < 0.001; AUC 0,84; cut-off value of -0.93%, sensibility 85%, specificity 70%) and circumferential strain rate (p < 0.001; AUC 0.88; cut-off -1.00%, sensibility 85%, specificity 70%). Conclusion: even in very initial stages, strain is already affected in AFD. CMR-FT can provide additional data without lengthening a CMR study. table 1: main CMR results LV - left ventricle RV- right ventricle 2D - two-dimensional 3D - three-dimensional
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- 230Anderson-Fabry disease: beyond what "eyes can see"
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2019
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.