A molecular rheostat: Kv2.1 currents maintain or suppress repetitive firing in motoneurons

Résumé fourni par la source

Key points Kv2 currents maintain and regulate motoneuron (MN) repetitive firing properties. Kv2.1 channel clustering properties are dynamic and respond to both high and low activity conditions. The enzyme calcineurin regulates Kv2.1 ion channel declustering. In patholophysiological conditions of high activity, Kv2.1 channels homeostatically reduce MN repetitive firing. Modulation of Kv2.1 channel kinetics and clustering allows these channels to act in a variable way across a spectrum of MN activity states. Abstract Kv2.1 channels are widely expressed in the central nervous system, including in spinal motoneurons (MNs) where they aggregate as distinct membrane clusters associated with highly regulated signalling ensembles at specific postsynaptic sites. Multiple roles for Kv2 channels have been proposed but the physiological role of Kv2.1 ion channels in mammalian spinal MNs is unknown. To determine the contribution of Kv2.1 channels to rat α‐motoneuron activity, the Kv2 inhibitor stromatoxin was used to block Kv2 currents in whole‐cell current clamp electrophysiological recordings in rat lumbar MNs. The results indicate that Kv2 currents permit shorter interspike intervals and higher repetitive firing rates, possibly by relieving Na+ channel inactivation, and thus contribute to maintenance of repetitive firing properties. We also demonstrate that Kv2.1 clustering properties in motoneurons are dynamic and respond to both high and low activity conditions. Furthermore, we show that the enzyme calcineurin regulates Kv2.1 ion channel clustering status. Finally, in a high activity state, Kv2.1 channels homeostatically reduce motoneuron repetitive firing. These results suggest that the activity‐dependent regulation of Kv2.1 channel kinetics allows these channels to modulate repetitive firing properties across a spectrum of motoneuron activity states.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.