Fluid Dynamics Analysis by CT Imaging Technique of New Sorbent Cartridges for Extracorporeal Therapies

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Recent innovations in biomaterials technology have led to the development of innovative sorbents adopted as adsorbing devices in the field of extracorporeal blood purification therapies. As removal mechanism, adsorption allows to remove specific molecules, selectively binding them to sorbent materials. In addition to the material properties, a quintessential aspect influencing device properties is blood flow distribution within the sorbent particles. OBJECTIVES: In order to adequately characterize the potential adsorbing properties for an effective blood purification therapy, an in vitro study assessing the fluid dynamics inside 3 new cartridges, HA130, HA230 and HA330 (Jafron, Zhuhai City, -China) was conducted through CT imaging technique. -Methods: The cartridges were placed in vertical position in the CT -gantry. Dye solution was circulated through the cartridges at 250 mL/min, longitudinal sections, 0.5 cm thick, were recorded for 60 s. Furthermore, an in vitro test was conducted to build pressure drop profiles. Blood was circulated at a different flow rate, 100-400 mL/min, step 50 mL/min. Pre and post cartridges pressures were acquired and pressure drop calculated. RESULTS: Sequential images demonstrated an excellent distribution of the flow inside the cartridges. Average flow velocity was 0.37 cm/s for the 3 cartridges. HA130 had a homogeneous flow profile along the entire length of the device; HA230 and HA330 showed minimal differences between central and peripheral regions. Pressure drop profiles resulted linear, increasing proportionally with blood flow rate and packing density. CONCLUSIONS: We may conclude that the structural and functional design of the studied cartridges is adequate for haemoperfusion with no channelling phenomena. This ensures maximum and optimal utilization of the sorbent contained in the devices.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.